I have posted this in general credit repair forums online and no-one seems to have good information.
Here are the facts:
-went to lawyer in 2005 to begin and file bankruptcy: took MANY debts and submitted proper letters. Had one specific debt that was from an individual for a vehicle that he wanted me to refund partial payment for since he had trouble starting it etc. He sent me a letter from an attorney asking several thousand dollars.
-I THOUGHT my lawyer sent proper notice to this person, and he may have.
-I THOUGHT this debt was included in the schedule of debtors/initial filing.
-I HAVE TRIED to contact my lawyer at that time, and he has responded saying he no longer deals with bankruptcies..and now does not respond to emails and his phone number disconnected (oops!). Therefore, I do NOT HAVE documentation providing we included this in initial filing.
-THE DEBT per the plaintiff occurred BEFORE my filing. The JUDGEMENT OCCURRED after BK discharge.
-I have done online disputes with credit bureaus attempting to get them to recognize this as supposing to be included in my BK, but with out proof, all the courts send back is 'verified'.
WHAT SHOULD I DO?
I have researched and found some language that indicates that ALL debts regardless if we placed into documentation 'should' be accepted as included. Can I simply make this case in writing to the court and ask them to remove the judgement? I do not think we have ANYTHING about the debt at all but I DO NOT WANT A JUDGEMENT on my credit, especially being that I paid and paid for my BK to keep this from happening.
HERE IS THE EXCERPT FROM ONLINE:
The majority view is that adding creditors after a final discharge is unnecessary. According to 11 U.S.C. Section 727(b), a discharge releases a debtor from all debts that arose before filing. This general rule is subject to few exceptions. Courts reason that the omission of a creditor cannot change dischargeability. Once a creditor has notice of discharge, even after a final order, a potentially dischargeable debt is unenforceable. The Sixth Circuit confirmed the majority view when rendering In re Madaj, 149 F.3d 467, 468 (6th Cir. 1998). Debtors nevertheless frequently file motions to reopen cases and add omitted creditors. Bankruptcy courts tend to indulge these motions liberally even though adding a creditor is unnecessary.
Here are the facts:
-went to lawyer in 2005 to begin and file bankruptcy: took MANY debts and submitted proper letters. Had one specific debt that was from an individual for a vehicle that he wanted me to refund partial payment for since he had trouble starting it etc. He sent me a letter from an attorney asking several thousand dollars.
-I THOUGHT my lawyer sent proper notice to this person, and he may have.
-I THOUGHT this debt was included in the schedule of debtors/initial filing.
-I HAVE TRIED to contact my lawyer at that time, and he has responded saying he no longer deals with bankruptcies..and now does not respond to emails and his phone number disconnected (oops!). Therefore, I do NOT HAVE documentation providing we included this in initial filing.
-THE DEBT per the plaintiff occurred BEFORE my filing. The JUDGEMENT OCCURRED after BK discharge.
-I have done online disputes with credit bureaus attempting to get them to recognize this as supposing to be included in my BK, but with out proof, all the courts send back is 'verified'.
WHAT SHOULD I DO?
I have researched and found some language that indicates that ALL debts regardless if we placed into documentation 'should' be accepted as included. Can I simply make this case in writing to the court and ask them to remove the judgement? I do not think we have ANYTHING about the debt at all but I DO NOT WANT A JUDGEMENT on my credit, especially being that I paid and paid for my BK to keep this from happening.
HERE IS THE EXCERPT FROM ONLINE:
The majority view is that adding creditors after a final discharge is unnecessary. According to 11 U.S.C. Section 727(b), a discharge releases a debtor from all debts that arose before filing. This general rule is subject to few exceptions. Courts reason that the omission of a creditor cannot change dischargeability. Once a creditor has notice of discharge, even after a final order, a potentially dischargeable debt is unenforceable. The Sixth Circuit confirmed the majority view when rendering In re Madaj, 149 F.3d 467, 468 (6th Cir. 1998). Debtors nevertheless frequently file motions to reopen cases and add omitted creditors. Bankruptcy courts tend to indulge these motions liberally even though adding a creditor is unnecessary.
Comment